HolonomiX
Benchmark

A bounded frontier benchmark with public proof.

1030 effective degrees of freedom. One GPU. 35 minutes.

6D Vlasov-Maxwell in compressed QTT form. Single H100. 100 steps. ML-DSA-44 signed receipt chain.

This benchmark is not presented as a universal claim about all compute. It is presented as a bounded public proof surface.

What happened

What happened

131,072⁶
Represented scale
1× H100
Hardware
35m 22s
Wall time
100
Time steps
10.94 MBCompressed output
Rank 45QTT rank
ML-DSA-44Signature

6D Vlasov-Maxwell two-stream instability executed in compressed QTT form on a single local NVIDIA H100 80GB HBM3 under a signed verification chain.

1
Manifest
2
Signature
3
Key commitment
4
Trust anchors
5
Declared hardware
6
Represented scale
Why it matters

Why it matters

The benchmark matters because it makes a different economic logic visible.

In bounded tensor-native regimes, the old dense-first assumption — that serious scale must map to institution-sized infrastructure — may no longer be the right baseline.

If a single GPU can govern 1030 degrees of freedom in 35 minutes, the cost structure of high-dimensional compute is not what the market currently prices it at.

That is the category implication. Not a faster run — a different infrastructure economics.

Evidence chain
1Run executed
Single H100, 100 steps
2Receipt packaged
Manifest + artifact hashes
3Cryptographically signed
ML-DSA-44, FIPS 204
4Publicly verifiable
Offline tooling included
Verification

What is publicly verifiable

The public receipt includes the following verifiable elements.

Manifest
receipt_manifest.json with full artifact listing
Signature
ML-DSA-44, FIPS 204 compliant digital signature
Key commitment
SHA-256 hashed key commitment and public key
Trust anchors
RFC3161 timestamp and git commit anchor
Artifact hashes
SHA-256 hash for every artifact in the receipt
Verification tooling
Offline verifier (verify_receipt.py) included
Scope boundary

What this does not claim

This benchmark is not a claim of dense explicit cell materialization.

It is not a claim that all workloads collapse in the same way.

It is not a claim that dense compute is obsolete everywhere.

It is a bounded public proof surface showing that, where tensor-native structure is real and governable, the dense-first baseline may no longer be the right baseline.

The fact that we state these boundaries explicitly is itself the point. Transparency means declaring not just what the proof shows, but what it does not.

Evidence tiers

Public proof and deeper diligence

Public Surface

The public benchmark receipt, receipt chain, artifact hashes, verification tooling, and scope boundary. Available to anyone.

Diligence Access

Deeper benchmark materials, expanded validation, proof-pack artifacts, and bounded evaluator surfaces. Available through the correct diligence lane.

Go deeper

Go deeper

If you want more than the public receipt, HolonomiX supports bounded evaluator and diligence pathways for qualified counterparties.

For technical evaluators
Benchmark depth and receipt verification.
For strategic parties
Proof-pack materials and bounded technical confidence.
For enterprise buyers
Applied value evaluation under scope.
Lane depth

Access depth by lane

LaneWhat is included
Public SurfaceFull public benchmark receipt, artifact hashes, verification tooling, and scope boundary.
DiligenceExpanded benchmark materials, proof-pack depth, and bounded evaluator surfaces.
PilotApplied workload evaluation with defined deliverables and success criteria.
Receipts

Published execution receipts

Each receipt anchors a bounded execution run with a full cryptographic provenance chain. Select a receipt to inspect the manifest, artifact hashes, and verification materials.

Inspect the public benchmark

Review the receipt chain, verify artifact hashes, and evaluate the public proof surface.

Want deeper access?

Request diligence, pilot, or strategic access through the correct lane.